Bennie et al.

After reading the article, I also responded to the publication pointing out the several errors and requesting that submissions might get a little better scrutiny-since way too many people think if something is in print-it must be right. And that piece should have rung many bells-since it clearly states it uses a non-military website, and not even the CMH, or the Army history site at Redstone...Somehow you would think that someone writing for the ARMY, might use ARMY resources??? NAW>>>>