How can one person make the decision that a valid entity cannot be discussed on a site? That seems to me to be revisionist in the worse possible way. Is she suggesting that such people did not exist? or is she refusing to acknowledge such existence?

I agree that having a group as described has merit but would need to be focused and fine tuned before it is launched. Defining who would be a member may take lots of planning as well as the long and short term purpose of the group.

[23 Jun 1999]