I am/was quite aware of "Art's post on those families". In essence I was actually responding to that post but responded under the one I did because words such as "reviewed, verified and corrected" were used. The original post just mentions the conclusions drawn from the "information". So my question remains the same. What was the information "reviewed, verified" that would cause him to change. In other words because of "this" information I originally had "this" but I now realize my original conclusions seemed correct based on what I had but with this "new" information I now realize that...etc. Again, my question is what was the "new"
information? A previously undiscovered birth record? or marriage record? or family bible entry? etc.

Perhaps could make a good genealogical case study?