HI SELMA

IM WONDERING IF YOU COULD HELP ME UNDERSTAND ONE OF THE POSTINGS ON PAGE 57 BIRTHS "WATTS"

THIS POSTING (IF IM READING CORRECTLY ) HAS THE BIRTH OF UNK CHILD POSTED AS A SLAVE IN 1859 - THE PARENTS HERE - HENRY AND SOPHIA WATTS - WERE POSTED AS FREE IN 1850 - HOW COULD THEY HAVE A CHILD POSTED AS A SLAVE IN 1859? (PS SELMA - THANKS THIS IS THE HENRY IM LOOKING FOR - POSTED WITH HIS SECOND WIFE )